Comments on: Enterprise Modeling – What we have learned and what we have not http://activeknowledgemodeling.com/2009/11/09/enterprise-modeling-what-we-have-learned-and-what-we-have-not/ Architect Your Business Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:44:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: modelpractice http://activeknowledgemodeling.com/2009/11/09/enterprise-modeling-what-we-have-learned-and-what-we-have-not/#comment-147 Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:56:24 +0000 http://activeknowledgemodeling.com/?p=297#comment-147 Great Article!
Strongly agree to many points, especially:

“Classification-oriented approaches to industrial ontologies should thus be questioned.”

Software industry should apply this to itself, e.g. to ISO 9126 – Software Quality, simply a tree structure of some quality criteria. Unfortunately the world is not a tree! (would be nice, quite easy to index)

]]> By: Business-Driven SOA – Reference Models and Standards « Active Knowledge Modeling http://activeknowledgemodeling.com/2009/11/09/enterprise-modeling-what-we-have-learned-and-what-we-have-not/#comment-91 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:40:17 +0000 http://activeknowledgemodeling.com/?p=297#comment-91 [...] and applying different local terminologies. Interpretation and meaning are contextual, and most classification structures are local to a view. OSIMM seems to recognize this last concern by refering to vocabularies rather than taxonomies, but [...]

]]>